I feel so smart knowing all these. Studying really does work. If you ever need to know about...
ACLU v. Reno (1996) -obscenity
Epperson v. Ark (1968) -religion
Edwards v. Aguilard (1985) -religion
Roth v. U.S (1958) -obscenity
Engel v. Vitale (1962) -religion
Nebraska Press Association v. Sturart (1976) -freedom of press
Church of lukumi baby Lu aye v. City of hialeah (1993) -religion
McCray county v. ALCU (2005) -religion
Sheppard v. Maxwell -freedom of press
Employment Division v. Smith (1990) -religion
Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972) -religion
Rav v. City of st. Paul -freedom of speech
Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971) -religion
Cohen v. California (1972) -obscenity
Santa Fe ISD v. Jane Doe (2005) -religion
New York Times v. U.S (1971) -freedom of press
Wallace v. Jaffree (1984) -religion
U.S v. Caldwell (1972) -freedom of press
F.C.C v. Pacifica (1978) -obscenity
Van Orden v. Texas (2005) -religion
Gitlow v. New York (1925) -freedom of speech
Lee v. Weismann (1992) -religion
Schank v. U.S (1919) -freedom of speech
let me know, I can assist you lol
Ones I still have to learn...they just aren't clicking :(
The Fanny Hill Case -obscenity
Near v. Minnesota (1936) -freedom of press
Miller v. California (1972) -obscenity
Idk if this will help but it's worth a try :)
ReplyDeleteFanny Hill: Showing your Fanny is sooo obscene. Go do that on your own Hill!
Near v. Minn:When you get Near Minnesota... watch out they have freedom of press. There's all kinds of crazy newspapers Near Minnesota!
Miller v. California: When Californians drink Miller light they get a little obscene.
Bahaha hope it helps girly!